Can We Still Call Them ‘Never Events’ When Accidents Happen So Frequently In MRI?

This post attempts to draw-together two recent threads from here on the MRI Metal Detector blog. First, there was a long-running question about the FDA and their online-accessible database of medical device accidents which, for months, appeared to be malfunctioning, and recently was repaired. Second, there was my post in which I identified 5 MRI ‘Never Events’ which, if industry standard procedures are followed, should never occur.

As I mentioned in the article on the restoration of the full MAUDE narratives, I filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOI) request for the data, motivated by a concern that the problem with the online database would not be resolved in a timely fashion. Below are a handful of PDF files from my FOI request, enumerating just MRI projectile accidents (one of the five types of MRI ‘never events’) from part of the 2009 data…

The length and scariness of this list says two things to me… 1. Even without correcting for the presumed 1% reporting rate, this list is already too long suggesting that we have a long way to go, and 2. Why aren’t we taking a more proactive role in preventing these sorts of accidents when there are tools and techniques readily available?

Is it that crushing facial injuries, brain trauma and scissors embedded in someone’s forehead are collectively ‘minor exceptions’ even when these events (and many others) occur within weeks of one another?

To answer the rhetorical question posed by the title of this post, absolutely we continue to call them ‘never events’ because they should never happen. The fact that we have a long way to go to get close to that frequency is not an indictment of the validity of the goal, but it is a reason to call for professional / regulatory change if the industry can’t close the gap on its own.

Tobias Gilk, President & MRI Safety Director
Mednovus, Inc.
Tobias.Gilk@Mednovus.com
www.MEDNOVUS.com

Click for Tobias Gilk's Twitter page.

delicious | digg | reddit | facebook | technorati | stumbleupon | savetheurl

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

7 Responses to “Can We Still Call Them ‘Never Events’ When Accidents Happen So Frequently In MRI?”

  1. [...] last year I posted a story that included links to a number of FDA MRI accident reports. One of the reports to the FDA’s [...]

  2. [...] this sort of thing. Hospitals are pretty good about keeping metal away from MRIs, but a post on the MRI Metal Detector Blog pointed us to some reports in an FDA database that describe some nasty stuff. A few gory [...]

  3. [...] this sort of thing. Hospitals are pretty good about keeping metal away from MRIs, but a post on the MRI Metal Detector Blog pointed us to some reports in an FDA database that describe some nasty stuff. A few gory [...]

  4. [...] this sort of thing. Hospitals are pretty good about keeping metal away from MRIs, but a post on the MRI Metal Detector Blog pointed us to some reports in an FDA database that describe some nasty stuff. A few gory [...]

  5. [...] this sort of thing. Hospitals are pretty good about keeping metal away from MRIs, but a post on the MRI Metal Detector Blog pointed us to some reports in an FDA database that describe some nasty stuff. A few gory de Read [...]

  6. [...] this sort of thing. Hospitals are pretty good about keeping metal away from MRIs, but a post on the MRI Metal Detector Blog pointed us to some reports in an FDA database that describe some nasty stuff. A few gory [...]

  7. [...] see that this sort of accident never recurs. Based on recent news accounts and last year’s shocking collection of ferromagnetic projectile accidents, the lessons from the Colombini tragedy are still profoundly [...]

Leave a Reply