<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>MRI Metal Detector Blog &#187; contraindicated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/tag/contraindicated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog</link>
	<description>Info on ferromagnetic detection and MRI safety &#38; screening</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:38:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<copyright>2006-2007 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>tobias.gilk@mednovus.com (MRI Metal Detector Blog)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>tobias.gilk@mednovus.com (MRI Metal Detector Blog)</webMaster>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Info on ferromagnetic detection and MRI safety &#38; screening</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>MRI Metal Detector Blog</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>MRI Metal Detector Blog</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>tobias.gilk@mednovus.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>30% Of Contraindicated Implant Patients Get MRIs Anyway!</title>
		<link>http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/2010/02/30-of-contraindicated-implant-patients-get-mris-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/2010/02/30-of-contraindicated-implant-patients-get-mris-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tobias Gilk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other MRI Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accreditation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American College of Radiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraindicated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intersocietal Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JCAHO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic resonance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pacemaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TJC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/?p=806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People who need healthcare for implanted pacemakers don't all the sudden stop needing MRI exams. But what happens to those patients when the pacemaker makes the MRI scan dangerous? You might be shocked to find out...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what&#8217;s even more alarming is that 20% of those implant patients that get MRIs experience some sort of device malfunction afterward! And yet, the dangers of imaging these patients are not well known by the doctors who prescribe these imaging studies.</p>
<p><span id="more-806"></span>The National Council on Aging just released a <a title="Click for NCOA Study Press Release" href="http://www.ncoa.org/press-room/press-release/ncoa-releases-survey-on.html" target="_blank">study</a> which details these alarming numbers. The matter-of-fact language of their release did nothing to diminish my welling fear as the study went on to detail chronic failures in our healthcare system to educate, alert, and prevent the dangers inherent in MR imaging of medical implant patients. Here are a few of the particulars:</p>
<ul>
<li>Medical implant patients over age 65 have between a 50% and 75% chance of requiring imaging during the useful life of their implant.</li>
<li>While 90% of physicians knew of MRI risks for <em>some</em> pacemakers, over half of doctors say that they aren&#8217;t informed about imaging limitations when a patient is implanted.</li>
<li>Nearly a third of patients who receive medical implants are not informed of MRI restrictions.</li>
<li>After exposed to the MRI risks to their implant, nearly 20% of these device patients experience some sort of problem or malfunction with their implant.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_807" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 260px"><a href="http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/pacemaker.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-807" title="pacemaker" src="http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/pacemaker.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="236" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Example of a Pacemaker Pulse-Generator Which Could Present Dangerous Contraindications For MRI Exams</p></div>
<p>The near universal opinion (98%) of healthcare providers is that they require additional information and training on these MRI safety risks.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope that regulatory (FDA and States) and accreditation (JCAHO, ACR, and IC) bodies for MR imaging look at ways that they can take a more active role in promoting education and protecting these patients.</p>
<address><a href="http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/about-tobias-gilk-editor/" target="_blank"><strong>Tobias Gilk</strong></a>, President &amp; MRI Safety Director</address>
<address>Mednovus, Inc.</address>
<address>Tobias.Gilk@Mednovus.com</address>
<address> <a title="Click for Mednovus.com" href="http://www.mednovus.com/products.html" target="_blank">www.MEDNOVUS.com</a></address>
<p><a href="http://www.twitter.com/tobiasgilk"><img title="twittericon_32-32" src="http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/twittericon_32-32.gif" alt="Click for Tobias Gilk's Twitter Profile" width="32" height="32" /></a><a title="Tobias Gilk on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/tobiasgilk" target="_blank"> Click here for Tobias’ Twitter Profile</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/2010/02/30-of-contraindicated-implant-patients-get-mris-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 MRI &#8216;Never Events&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/2009/09/5-mri-never-events/</link>
		<comments>http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/2009/09/5-mri-never-events/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tobias Gilk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ferromagnetic Detection for MRI Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other MRI Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraindicated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadolinium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GFR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kidney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[near-miss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[never event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projectile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resonance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[translational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/?p=591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are the 5 types of 'never events' in the MRI suite that should raise safety 'red flags' even if they don't result in injuries?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those unfamiliar with the term, a &#8216;never event&#8217; is a label used to describe an adverse event that is wholly avoidable by simply following established best practices. For example, if you have an accurate count of the surgical instruments before and after surgery, there should never be an event where the patient leaves the OR with a sponge or clamp sewn up inside of them. A retained surgical instrument, or wrong-site surgery, or bed-sores, or patient mis-identification, or medication errors are all examples of &#8216;never events&#8217;.</p>
<p>Some insurance payers are beginning to refuse reimbursement for care that is necessitated by certain &#8216;never events&#8217;, and that list is likely to grow. And while they may not always result in patient injury, I&#8217;d like to propose my own list of 5 MRI &#8216;never events&#8217; which should at least trigger an investigation&#8230;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span id="more-591"></span>#5 Unauthorized Access: If any person, patient, visitor or staff member, gains access to the restricted areas of the MRI suite (Zones III and IV) without having been appropriately screened and supervised, this should raise red-flags and be the impetus for a review of the physical protections and operational protocols. Too often, because these safety-symptoms don&#8217;t immediately result in injury, they are disregarded as harmless, which couldn&#8217;t be further from the truth. If unscreened people or equipment are making it into the controlled access areas of the MRI suite, it&#8217;s only a matter of time before one of them is involved in a real accident.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">#4 NSF / Renal Function Screening: A year ago, this may have appeared as the #1 item on this list, but the fact is that, today, many facilities are doing a great job of this. Essentially, we need to provide, at a minimum, a <a title="ACR Gadolinium Contrast Patient Risk Screening" href="http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/MRSafety/recommendations_gadolinium-based.aspx" target="_blank">renal function risk-factor screening</a> for every patient prior to being administered Gadolinium-based contrast agents. And, minimally, for patients identified as falling within one of the higher-risk profiles, a calculated eGFR should be taken for verification of patient risk and to inform the treatment of that patient. As with the #5 never event above, the failure to provide effective screening, even if it doesn&#8217;t result in an adverse outcome, is enough to warrant a review of operational protocols.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">#3 Contraindicated Implants: There are times when, as a concurrent result of poor patient history / records, and inconspicuous (or absent) indicators for medical devices, patients (or visitors) enter the MRI scanner room with contraindicated devices. Nobody expects MR Technologists to be omniscient about what is on or inside their patients, but it is critical that we provide an appropriately thorough screening for the circumstances to try and ascertain whether the patient has any of the potpourri of shunts, pacers, stimulators, clips, pins, plates, etc&#8230; that may be dangerous to them. Any failure to use the appropriate means available to identify contraindications should, minimally, spur an evaluation of policies &amp; procedures.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">#2 RF Burns: This one factor may be the fastest-growing source of patient injury in MRI. By verifying that unneeded coils and leads are removed, that remaining leads are appropriately positioned and insulated from the patient, that the patient&#8217;s body is not positioned to form large-caliber loops, and that there is appropriate distance / insulation between the patient and any transmitting RF coils are all integral, requisite elements to minimizing the risks of MR burns. A failure to follow the appropriate steps to protect the patient, even if the shortcut doesn&#8217;t result in a visible burn, should (as with the proceeding never events) trigger a review of operational procedures.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">#1 Projectiles / Missiles: Screening protocols should do everything to make sure that ferromagnetic materials are not brought into the MRI scanner room. Any discovered ferromagnetic material inside the MRI room indicates a breakdown in screening and presents all of the ingredients for injury or equipment damage. Particularly for MRI providers that don&#8217;t gown all of their patients, the use of a<a title="SAFESCAN Ferromagnetic Detectors" href="http://www.mednovus.com/products.html" target="_blank"> ferromagnetic detector</a> is more than just recommended, it is codified in the ACR Guidance Document for Safe MR Practices as a part of the MR safety best practice. And as with all of the MRI never events before #1, any discovery of a ferromagnetic threat inside the magnet room should trigger a review of existing protections, operations and protocols.</p>
<p>While these 5 don&#8217;t encompass all of MRI safety, they do clearly represent 5 of the most common (and most avoidable) hazards in the MRI environment. MRI providers should have rigorous protocols and protections to minimize these risks to patients, staff, visitors and, in the case of projectile accidents, millions of dollars of MRI equipment.</p>
<address><a href="../2009/09/2009/09/2009/09/2009/08/2009/?page_id=314" target="_blank"><strong>Tobias Gilk</strong></a>, President &amp; MRI Safety Director</address>
<address>Mednovus, Inc.</address>
<address>Tobias.Gilk@Mednovus.com</address>
<address> <a title="Link to MEDNOVUS.com" href="http://www.mednovus.com/" target="_blank">www.MEDNOVUS.com</a></address>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/2009/09/5-mri-never-events/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

