<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>MRI Metal Detector Blog &#187; General Electric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/tag/general-electric/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog</link>
	<description>Info on ferromagnetic detection and MRI safety &#38; screening</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:38:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<copyright>2006-2007 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>tobias.gilk@mednovus.com (MRI Metal Detector Blog)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>tobias.gilk@mednovus.com (MRI Metal Detector Blog)</webMaster>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Info on ferromagnetic detection and MRI safety &#38; screening</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>MRI Metal Detector Blog</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>MRI Metal Detector Blog</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>tobias.gilk@mednovus.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Building An MRI, GE Accidentally Invents Time-Travel</title>
		<link>http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/2010/02/building-an-mri-ge-accidentally-invents-time-travel/</link>
		<comments>http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/2010/02/building-an-mri-ge-accidentally-invents-time-travel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tobias Gilk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ferromagnetic Detection for MRI Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ferromagnetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitachi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projectile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toshiba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/?p=791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does the quantum-mechanics of MRI scanners enable time-travel? That might explain a few things...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;ve been reading too many headlines in supermarket check-out aisles, but what else is a guy with an overactive imagination supposed to come up with?</p>
<p>You see, back in 1983 when GE was going through their pre-market approvals with the FDA for their first commercial clinical MRI system, they indicated that MRI suite safety minimally required ferromagnetic detection pre-screening. The only problem was, it hadn&#8217;t been invented yet!</p>
<p><span id="more-791"></span>During R&amp;D the physicists at GE discovered that the MRI scanner could be tuned in such a way to create something of a &#8216;worm hole&#8217; and permit time-travel. Anyone who has spent 2 or 3 hours in an MRI, only to have their wristwatch tell them they&#8217;d only been in it for 30 minutes, won&#8217;t have a hard time believing that there&#8217;s still some vestige of time-warp still left, even in contemporary MRI scanners.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-792" title="mri-warp" src="http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/mri-warp.jpg" alt="Time Travel Via MRI Scanner" width="288" height="297" /></p>
<p>What did the GE physicists see during their clandestine time-traveling jaunts into the 21st century? We suspect that they saw MRI&#8217;s everywhere &#8211; hospitals, imaging centers, strip malls &#8211; and each and every one of them was protected by ferromagnetic detection pre-screening devices. When they returned to 1983, it seemed such a natural thought, to protect patients, staff and these marvelous machines, that the requirement for ferromagnetic detectors actually made it into their safety submittals to the FDA.</p>
<p>Admittedly, I&#8217;m taking (more than a little) artistic license here. What GE <em>actually</em> stated in their November, 1983 &#8216;Hazard Analysis&#8217; that accompanied their MRI device application to the FDA was that metal detection (for prevention of ferromagnetic projectile accidents) was a &#8220;minimum requirement&#8221; for safety in the MRI suite.</p>
<p>As described in my <a title="Click for 'Colombini, Codes, Metal Detectors &amp; MRI Safety'" href="http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/2010/02/colombini-codes-metal-detectors-and-mri-safety/" target="_blank">exhaustive summary</a> of a couple weeks ago, conventional &#8220;airport&#8221; style metal detectors are actually horribly counterproductive to pre-MRI screening for most patients, particularly when screening for ferromagnetic materials. Operationally, this is a truth that simply couldn&#8217;t be known to GE at the time that they were preparing their recommendations for MRI safety, a concern that never really existed before they brought this product to market.</p>
<p>This metal detector &#8220;minimum requirement&#8221; soon became an unwelcome nuisance, and GE&#8217;s promotion of it as a safety tool withered to near-nothingness.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say that the hazard that the metal detector was to help mitigate withered, too. In fact, as GE (and Siemens, and Philips, and Toshiba, and Hitachi&#8230;) made stronger and better MRI systems, the risks of ferromagnetic projectiles kept ratcheting upward, too.</p>
<p>Today we&#8217;re faced with sticky situation&#8230; The entire FDA approval of MRI can be traced back to this GE application, which recognized &#8211; and required &#8211; projectile protection. The only available tool (at the time) turned out to be far less effective than hoped, so its use was discontinued. After a tragic, headline-grabbing MRI projectile fatality in 2001, real ferromagnetic (only) MRI pre-screening instruments were developed, and have been available for a number of years. However, these new tools, which respond specifically to the needs identified by GE almost 30 years ago, haven&#8217;t been appointed by manufacturers and regulators to the safety role that they&#8217;re meant to play.</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s all a product of the ongoing effort on the part of the government to keep the secret of time-travel&#8230; well&#8230; secret, but nobody seems interested in revisiting patient protections called for in 1983.</p>
<p>And what became of those GE physicists who originally stumbled upon the secret of MRI time-travel? Well, after collecting data on the forthcoming 20 years worth of Superbowls, World Series&#8217;, and PowerBall jackpots, they each decided that working for a living was, simply, too much work.</p>
<p>But you can bet, whatever private island-paradise they own today, when their doctor proscribes them an MRI, they find one with ferromagnetic pre-screening.</p>
<p>; )</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="70%" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: left;" bgcolor="#ffff99" bordercolor="#000000">Lest anyone unfamiliar with my dry wit think that I was the least-bit serious in the above post&#8230;   I  know of no relationship between MRI&#8217;s and time travel. That part of the story is completely made-up. But that doesn&#8217;t make the <em>entire</em> post fictional. The details about the 1983 &#8216;Hazard Analysis&#8217;, and its call for ferromagnetic projectile protection (part of GE&#8217;s original application to the FDA) are correct.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></p>
<address><a href="http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/about-tobias-gilk-editor/" target="_blank"><strong>Tobias Gilk</strong></a>, President &amp; MRI Safety Director</address>
<address>Mednovus, Inc.</address>
<address>Tobias.Gilk@Mednovus.com</address>
<address> <a title="Click for Mednovus.com" href="http://www.mednovus.com/products.html" target="_blank">www.MEDNOVUS.com</a></address>
<p><a href="http://www.twitter.com/tobiasgilk"><img title="twittericon_32-32" src="http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/twittericon_32-32.gif" alt="Click for Tobias Gilk's Twitter Profile" width="32" height="32" /></a><a title="Tobias Gilk on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/tobiasgilk" target="_blank"> Click here for Tobias’ Twitter Profile</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrimetaldetector.com/blog/2010/02/building-an-mri-ge-accidentally-invents-time-travel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

